It is possible to tell that the moral and ethical system of values is display of some model of society (and the world, existing in a brain of each person and arisen along with emergence of abstract thinking, that is with understanding by the person own "I", or rather public "Super I".
Here as key concept "value" again acts. Values "utilitarian" 1, generated by former morals, that is what are made for the sake of and for something, but not of internal need, requirement, a worthiness cannot act as "distant" values.
"Everything that has value in the present world, – Nietzsche writes, – has its not in itself, not by the nature – in the nature there are no values, – but because that to it gave value once, presented it, and we were these donators!" (4,6
However, such approach to the moral and ethical system constructed by Nietzsche is represented excessively simplified as convincingly showed S.L.Frank6, Nietzsche who called system "ethics of love to distant". In Frank's representation Nietzsche's system is represented internally logical and reasonable, and preference of one of two mighty moral systems founded on love for the neighbor and love to "distant" cannot be brought, certainly, logically out of moral representations.
According to Nietzsche the human history shares for three periods – domoralny when the abstract thinking is not created till the end yet and the person does not realize himself, being guided in the actions only by instincts and emotions.
Thus, consecutive rational development of the model which is based on a primacy of human consciousness, relative (human) values has to lead eventually to global crisis of society about what also Nietzsche repeatedly warned.
Frank notes also very important fact – formally under logic of love to "distant" a lot of things can be brought – the power, money, belief, the world domination and many other things. Thus the "distant" purpose justifies all means, the compassion is not the natural limiter any more – with it already scientifically finished, and it is simple to predict result from historical experience. "I sacrifice myself the love and the neighbor, like myself." (6
It is represented what exactly this situation and is main "grain" of philosophy of Nietzsche. And, though Nietzsche brings him in different types in various areas (for example, in ethics, morals, ontology) is independent, but, in fact, it is a direct consequence of relativity of thinking and, certainly, automatically extends on all types of human culture.
Thus, it is available there is at least a communication of internal processes of consciousness with visible and latent tendencies of development in philosophy, in society that, certainly, demands drawing attention to a problem of "scientific and philosophical" research of a brain, as object of thinking.